🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a proposed legislation that include reductions in the recommended coverage of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“As an elected official, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” stated the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during wider concerns about industry interference with health policies. In recent weeks, global health authorities raised concerns that the tobacco industry was escalating campaigns to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of corporate influence worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” commented Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation fails to be approved because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be lowered to less than half “within the WHO-FCTC guideline limits”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the law is enacted.

The WHO specifically advises a warning should cover at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for different infractions “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia says the firm is “committed to responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We reside in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and collect the yield and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Public health laws in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative commented: “BAT Zambia conducts its operations according with applicable local laws. Moreover, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, they said, adding that young individuals should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to realize planned public health goals, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, adding that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which encompasses increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was approached for comment.